Val Workman

The opinions expressed by the bloggers below and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Ryma Technology Solutions. As they say, you can't innovate without breaking a few eggs...

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.
Posted by on in Product Management
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 12900
  • 0 Comments
  • Print
  • PDF

Product Management: the Con


The confidence element is the thing that hooks the mark and makes a good score possible,
while at the same time it reduces the possibility of trouble resulting from the swindle. Product
Managers need to have the confidence of customers and internal product investors. I'm sure
I'm not the only one, who after evangelizing a product for two days at a user conference or
budgeting & roadmapping session, might begin to wonder who they really were.

The tip is a game for con men who are also gamblers, for it requires some dexterity in the
manipulation of the cards. It is really no more than a crooked poker game with the confidence
element added. There is the mark who believes he's going to have help cheating. In product
management who's the mark? Is it the investors, who continually dump money into product
initiatives never knowing if or how much they'll ever get a return?

There's the roper, who'll bring the mark into the game by gaining the mark's confidence,
and then convince the mark to gamble more and more. If that doesn't sound like product
management I don't know what does. Does your product management team really know how
your new feature set will generate returns? Oh really, how much will the next release bring
back to your investors?

The insideman will be the pretend mark, and works with the roper to increase the stakes in
the game. Now in the tip there are many variations, sometimes Marketing can play the role
of the insideman, most of the time its development, but I've even seen Sales participate.
Product management gets the investors to believe if there were just a few more features...
Then marketing could say this, or Development could do that, or Sales could close all of these...
When the stakes are high enough, the insideman using one of many methods of 'putting in the
sting' takes the mark for all they have. Not a very friendly game in my book.

It doesn't have to be this way, and product management can be on the up-and-up. The
investors in product initiatives don't have to feel like they're in a game of chance that they keep
getting sucked into. Product investment doesn't have to be a bottomless pit. Product managers
shouldn't have to be confidence men declaring to the organization's marks, "Trust me!" each
quarter.

Good traceability from the market evidence through to market requirements prevents the
roper from pushing his/her agenda; and let this be a warning, there's nothing more deadly than
a well educated female roper. By doing opportunity definition and providing accountability,
the mark can gain back a little control, and not be at the roper and insideman's mercy. Product
Roadmap Definition locked-tied with good Opportunity Definition can remove the impact of

every insideman.

Just as following by the GAAP [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles], the accounting
profession has been able to keep these undesirable elements out of finance, performing at
least some activities in each of the Seven Pillars of Product Management can keep the con out
of product initiatives.

Rate this blog entry:
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Wednesday, 10 March 2021